Actor-politician Ravi Kishan gets interim relief delhi high court. The court passed an interim order protecting his personality rights and restraining multiple individuals, websites and online platforms from using Ravi Kishan’s name, image, likeness and other personality traits without his permission.
Court orders removal of objectionable content
According to the ANI report, the court order also covers the use of artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, machine learning and deepfakes technology.Justice Jyoti Singh heard details of the case filed by Ravi Kishan seeking protection from misuse of his identity on social media and online platforms.The court also directed the deletion of URLs allegedly used to spread obscene, pornographic and artificial intelligence-generated content using Ravi Kishan’s identity. The defendants and the relevant domain registrars were required to delete the listed URLs within three days of receiving the order.The court further said that if they fail to do so, platforms such as Meta, Google and X must start removing the relevant URLs within 72 hours of receiving the notice.
When is the next hearing date?
According to the case filed by Ravi Kishan, multiple websites and social media accounts allegedly uploaded objectionable videos, false claims, AI-generated videos and sexually explicit content using his name and images without permission. He also claimed that some websites used his name in keywords and URLs to host pornographic content.The High Court has issued a summons in this matter. The accused has been directed to file a written statement within 30 days.Next, the case will be submitted to the Joint Registrar on August 13, 2026, while the interim injunction application is scheduled to be heard by the court on October 16, 2026.On the acting front, he was recently seen in the legal comedy series “Maamla Legal Hai”.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on legal hearings reported by third-party sources. The details provided represent only allegations by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing and a final verdict has not yet been reached. The publication did not claim the allegations were true.
